The Problem with the Popular Books

  I read Anna Karenina on my own a couple of years ago. Would I have read this classic if it lacked the (well-deserved) fanfare it posses today? No, and I probably wouldn’t have been able to find it. Reading “Graphs, Maps, and Trees”, I became intrigued by the following statement regarding the attempt to quantify … Continue reading The Problem with the Popular Books Read more →

Moretti’s Multiple Metaphors

In reading Franco Moretti’s “Abstract Models for Literary History—1,” his use of multiple metaphors to talk about novels became increasingly interesting to me. Throughout the article he uses metaphors from different fields of study to describe the changes he see in genres and cycles. First, he describes novels in a way he sees as typical, that […] Read more →

Paradigms in Literary History

The dichotomy between objectivity and subjectivity makes me uncomfortable because often, it is a false dichotomy. Perception is always shaped by expectation and so nothing can ever be purely objective. Bias from the beholder always influences interpretation. With my reservations about the use of the word objectivity in mind, I will however say that Moretti seems to be calling for… Read more →

Read more →

“Leaden circles dissolved in the air…”

Woolf offers much insight in regard to her theory of connection and knowing others. Not only does she comment on explicit seen connections, Woolf also highlights unseen connections that bind people.             Septimus’s death is one of the most important events in the novel. By subtly connecting characters, his action becomes part of a collective […] Read more →